Wine Review: 2008 Cachet No. 01 by Stag’s Hollow

27 02 2013
There is no debate:  this is a baller-looking bottle of wine.

There is no debate: this is a baller-looking bottle of wine.

Apologies in advance to my local Alberta readers:  this review will be almost useless to you.  I have never seen this bottle in our fair province, or on a retail store anywhere else for that matter.  I got it for Christmas a couple years ago from a cousin-in-law out in Vancouver (thanks Brad!), was immediately impressed by the rap-video blinginess of its container (the bottle must weigh 2 pounds empty) and then discovered through research that it was created as part of a unique and forward-thinking experimental line of wines by stalwart Okanagan producer Stag’s Hollow.  The Cachet wines are limited edition blends of top quality grapes which are outside of the standard SH catalog; they are made once, as a small run in a single vintage, and then never replicated again.  So while this is the 2008 vintage of Cachet No. 01, there is no 2009 or 2010 bottling — the 1500 bottles (125 cases) of this wine from that single year are all there is.  I have no idea how this is commercially workable, but I find it fascinating.  These high-end one-off blends put the power in the hands of the winemaker to express a different vision with these specialty wines every year…or at least that was the plan.  As it turns out, only two Cachets have ever been made:  this one, and the sequel Cachet No. 02 (made from Grenache, Syrah, Viognier and Marsanne) that was released around the same time.  The world is still waiting on Cachet No. 03, and I’m sort of wondering whether the concept has died before it ever really got off the ground.

Individually hand-written limited edition bottles:  cool.  Getting your website wrong on your own label (it's actually cachetwines.com):  not cool.

Individually hand-written limited edition bottles: cool. Getting your website wrong on your own label (it’s actually cachetwines.com): not cool.

But back to Cachet No. 01.  Believe it or not, this is a Tempranillo-based blend, making it the only Canadian wine I have ever seen made using this Spanish grape.  Even better, the Tempranillo is estate-sourced, grown in a special rocky subplot on the Stag’s Hollow property called The Hollow, where the vines get extreme heat and sun in the summer but must withstand much cooler temperatures later in the growing season.  The precise blend is 40% Tempranillo, 35% Merlot, 20% Syrah and 5% Cabernet Sauvignon, and the wine is modelled after the new riper style of modern Spanish reds (as an added homage, it’s even aged in new American oak barrels sourced from the Spanish region of Navarra).  For a producer who has never previously grown Tempranillo to plant it in a new site and learn how to work with it only so that it can be used for one year in a single small-production premium wine…I’m not even sure where I’m going with this. The whole concept cuts so against the grain of how things are normally done that it’s either revolutionary or insane or both.

Entering into its fifth year of life, the inaugural rendition of Cachet was still a deep, thick purple-ruby colour, thinning out very slightly near the rim but still not showing a hint of browning.  Brambly and jammy on the nose, it exuded thick waves of candied, almost confectionary fruit (creme de cassis, raspberry liqueur) along with anise, violets and liniment/medicinal notes.  There is an impressive depth to the wine:  on both the nose and the palate, its flavours persevere without fading or changing into something lesser, a trait that not all Canadian reds share.  On the palate, the Cachet had a medium-full body, subtle and slightly powdery tannins, and straight line acidity making railroad tracks down the centre of the tongue.  Even after medium-term aging, it was still mostly primary fruit — blackberry and black cherry, with a touch of fig/raisin — lined with baking spice, a prevalent smoky oak influence and a lingering sweet note almost like angel food cake.  However, it doesn’t finish cloying and is eminently drinkable throughout.

Cork Rating:  9.1/10 (The best cork I've seen in awhile -- longer than normal, great font, red wax, killer.

Cork Rating: 9.1/10 (The best cork I’ve seen in awhile — longer than normal, great font, red wax, killer.

There is no way that I would ever guess this bottle comes from Canada, which in some ways is a good thing (presumably part of the reason to put so much effort into a high-end Canadian red is to establish that it can stand on its own on the world stage) and in other ways is a bad thing (there’s nothing about the bottle that specifically reflects its Okanagan roots, no strong sense of place about it).  I suppose when the raison d’être for your wine is to emulate cutting-edge Spanish Tempranillo blends halfway across the world, whatever local touch the wine might have is necessarily sacrificed to that goal.  This is one of the better non-Spanish bottles of Tempranillo that I’ve had, and it does a good job reflecting the new Spanish style (albeit without the streak of earthiness that even the most modern wines from Spain seem to possess), but in our national search for a niche in the global wine world, we may be better served by not being the cover band for traditional powerhouses.  The price tag of this bottle may also serve to detract from its marketability — $50 at the cellar door can buy you a LOT of amazing wine and is a hard price point in which to remain competitive.  I love the vision, creativity and ambition behind Cachet; I love the risk and the reach involved with pursuing it; I quite liked the wine itself; but I worry that the soul and the birthmark of Cachet No. 01 gets a little lost in translation because of how and why it was created.

88- points

$45 to $50 CDN

Advertisements

Actions

Information

7 responses

28 02 2013
Dwight Sick

Appreciate your comments and criticisms about the wine. There was a 2009 Cachet No. 2 which was a blend based on Grenache (sold out) and a 2010 Cachet No. 3 that has not been released yet (Tempranillo blend of 100% estate grown fruit). I look forward to hearing your thoughts on it as I think that this wine quashes the concerns you expressed about Cachet No. 1.

Cheers,
Dwight Sick

Like

28 02 2013
petervetsch

Thanks for reading and for your thoughts, Dwight! I’m glad the Cachet concept is still alive and well and will definitely try to track down a bottle of Cachet No. 03 when it comes out so that I can post a follow-up review. Cachet No. 01 was thoroughly enjoyable and I did appreciate the skill that you out into it. Cheers!

Like

28 02 2013
vinoinlove

The cork looks really nice. Haven’t seen one of those for a while. Thanks for sharing!

Like

1 03 2013
Russ

I remember picking out that bottle – Les & Brad asked for some advice – glad you’ve enjoyed it!

Like

1 03 2013
petervetsch

Great choice! I love trying new and adventurous stuff like this, and I especially love seeing local producers make it. Thanks!!

Like

10 03 2013
S. Andersen

Just wanted to say how cool it was to see a quote from you in Culinare! It was about Crazyweed which HANDS DOWN is my favorite Canmore resto.

Like

10 03 2013
petervetsch

Hey thanks! About the soup, I presume? I absolutely adore their soup…we go there all the time. Cheers!

Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: